首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
大型再生水厂不同污水处理工艺的能耗比较与节能途径
摘要点击 2490  全文点击 1682  投稿时间:2014-11-25  修订日期:2015-01-13
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  再生水厂  A2/O-MBR  脉冲曝气  污水  能耗
英文关键词  reclaimed water plant  A2/O-MBR  pulse aeration  wastewater  energy consumption
作者单位E-mail
杨敏 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085 yangmsunb@126.com 
李亚明 北京工业大学建筑工程学院, 北京 100124
北京排水集团清河再生水厂, 北京 100192 
liyaming@bdc.cn 
魏源送 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085 yswei@rcees.ac.cn 
吕鑑 北京工业大学建筑工程学院, 北京 100124  
郁达伟 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085  
刘吉宝 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085  
樊耀波 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085  
中文摘要
      能耗是再生水厂运行主要的考核指标. 采用比能耗分析法、单元能耗分析法以及冗余分析法等探讨了清河再生水厂不同污水处理工艺(倒置A2/O、A2/O和A2/O-MBR)的能耗构成和时空分布特征. 重点考察了A2/O-MBR工艺的主要能耗环节和原因,探讨了A2/O-MBR工艺的节能改造方法,并比较了其改造前后的能耗. 结果表明,曝气是清河再生水厂污水处理的常规工艺和A2/O-MBR工艺的主要耗能需求,分别占总能耗的42.97%和50.65%. 在保证A2/O-MBR工艺出水水质的同时,采用脉冲曝气改造后节能效果明显. 改造后的膜运行通量增大约20%,吨水能耗为0.53 kW·h·kg-3,降幅达42.39%,去除单位COD能耗为1.29 kW·h·kg-1,降幅达54.74%. 该厂A2/O-MBR工艺回流量大,但与出水水质相关性较弱. 在一定范围内降低回流比不会造成出水水质恶化,因此可作为进一步节能的方向之一.
英文摘要
      Energy consumption is the main performance indicator of reclaimed water plant (RWP) operation. Methods of specific energy consumption analysis, unit energy consumption analysis and redundancy analysis were applied to investigate the composition and spatio-temporal distribution of energy consumption in Qinghe RWP with inverted A2/O, A2/O and A2/O-MBR processes. And the A2/O-MBR process was mainly analyzed to identify the main nodes and causes for high energy consumption, approaches for energy saving were explored, and the energy consumption before and after upgrading for energy saving was compared. The results showed that aeration was the key factor affecting energy consumption in both conventional and A2/O-MBR processes, accounting for 42.97% and 50.65% of total energy consumption, respectively. A pulsating aeration allowed an increasing membrane flux and remarkably reduced the energy consumption of the A2/O-MBR process while still meeting the effluent standard, e.g., the membrane flux was increased by 20%, and the energy consumptions per kiloton wastewater and kilogram CODremoved were decreased by 42.39% to 0.53 kW·h·kg-3 and by 54.74% to 1.29 kW·h·kg-1, respectively. The decrease of backflow ratio in the A2/O-MBR process within a certain range would not deteriorate the effluent quality due to its insignificant correlation with the effluent quality, and therefore may be considered as one of the ways for further energy saving.

您是第52818364位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2