首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
燃煤电厂可凝结颗粒物的测试与排放
摘要点击 3483  全文点击 1639  投稿时间:2014-11-01  修订日期:2014-11-29
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  燃煤电厂  固定源  可凝结颗粒物  排放  测试
英文关键词  coal-fired power plants  stationary source  condensable particulate matter  emission  test
作者单位E-mail
裴冰 上海市环境监测中心, 上海 200235
上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 200030
国家环境保护大气复合污染来源与控制重点实验室, 北京 100084 
peibing@semc.gov.cn 
中文摘要
      建立了固定源可凝结颗粒物(condensable particulate matter, CPM)采样-分析方法,开发了CPM采样配件,与EPA Method 202方法进行比对后应用于燃煤电厂.结果表明燃煤电厂CPM排放均值为(21.2±3.5)mg ·m-3,同步使用国标方法测得的FPM为(20.6±10.0) mg ·m-3; 高效除尘器可有效降低FPM的排放水平,但对CPM无太大影响.高效除尘改造后CPM对TPM的贡献将有所提高,应引起足够的重视.CPM中冷凝液贡献了68%,滤膜为32%,有机组分较少,为1%.
英文摘要
      The sampling-analysis method for CPM of stationary source was established and the sampling device was developed. The determination method was compared with EPA method 202 and applied in real-world test in coal-fired power plants. The result showed the average CPM emission concentration in the coal-fired power plant was (21.2±3.5) mg ·m-3 while the FPM was (20.6±10.0) mg ·m-3 during the same sampling period according to the method in the national standard. The high-efficiency dust removal device could efficiently reduce FPM emission but showed insignificant effect on CPM. The mass contribution of CPM to TPM would rise after high-efficiency dust removal rebuilding project, to which more attention should be paid. The condensate contributed 68% to CPM mass while the filter contributed 32%, and the organic component contributed little to CPM, accounting for only 1%.

您是第53216512位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2