| 黄河流域重点碳排放企业空间分布特征及影响因素 |
| 摘要点击 621 全文点击 72 投稿时间：2024-04-22 修订日期：2024-06-14 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 重点碳排放企业 空间分布特征 面板数据回归 影响因素 黄河流域 |
| 英文关键词 major carbon emission enterprises spatial distribution characteristics panel data regression influencing factors Yellow River Basin |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 贾培煜 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院碳中和研究院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | tysfjpy@163.com | | 任笑雨 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | | | 杨洁 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | | | 李宗善 | 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085 | zsli_st@rcees.ac.cn | | 梁海斌 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院碳中和研究院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | | | 赵瑞东 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院碳中和研究院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | | | 弓磊 | 太原师范学院地理科学学院, 晋中 030619
太原师范学院汾河流域地表过程与资源生态安全山西省重点实验室, 晋中 030619 | |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 黄河流域重点碳排放企业兼具促进经济增长与产生碳排放的双重属性,是实现区域经济高质量发展和“双碳”目标的重要载体. 基于2001~2020年黄河流域重点碳排放企业空间点位数据和社会经济发展数据,采用空间分析方法研究了重点碳排放企业的空间分布特征,并结合面板数据回归模型探索其影响因素. 结果表明：①黄河流域重点碳排放企业空间分布趋向单一方向扩张,向心集聚叠加外围分散分布趋势增强,形成的“单中心-多区”或“多中心-多区”空间形态特征有利于“双碳”目标下差异化调控政策的落实. ②从影响企业区位选择的3类条件来看,基础条件是影响黄河流域重点碳排放企业空间分布的主导因素,便利条件有利于黄河流域重点碳排放企业发展,要素条件则成为未来引导黄河流域重点碳排放企业合理增长的关键. 从影响因素结果得出,调结构和促创新应是未来黄河流域控碳和降碳的重要发力点. |
| 英文摘要 |
| The major carbon emission enterprises in the Yellow River Basin have the dual attributes of promoting economic growth and generating carbon emissions, which are important carriers to achieve high-quality development of the regional economy and the goal of the “dual-carbon” target. Based on the spatial location and socio-economic development data of the major carbon emission enterprises in the Yellow River Basin from 2001 to 2020, the evolution of spatial distribution, characteristics of agglomeration patterns, and spatial evolution of agglomeration of the major carbon emission enterprises were studied by using various spatial analysis methods, such as the standard deviation ellipse, kernel density estimation, Ripley's K function, etc. This was combined with the panel data regression model, and the effects of the basic, convenient, and elemental conditions on the spatial distribution of the major carbon emission enterprises were also explored. The results showed that： ① From 2001 to 2020, the number of the major carbon emission enterprises in the Yellow River Basin continued to grow, and their spatial distribution tended to expand in a single direction. The major carbon emission enterprises were closely clustered around the trunk and tributaries of the Yellow River, and the degree of agglomeration was different under different observation distances. The spatial morphological characteristics were presented as the ‘monocenter and multi-zone’ or ‘multicenter and multi-zone,’ which were conducive to the implementation of differentiated regulation policies in regard to the ‘dual-carbon’ target. ② From the perspective of the three types of conditions affecting the location selection of major carbon emission enterprises in the Yellow River Basin, the basic conditions dominated their spatial distribution, and the convenient conditions were conducive to their development. In the future, the elemental conditions would become the key variables to guide the reasonable growth of major carbon emission enterprises in the whole basin. These results suggest that structural adjustment and innovation promotion should be continuously strengthened to achieve the carbon control and reduction targets in the Yellow River Basin. |
|
|
|
