中国物流绿色低碳发展空间关联效应及影响因素 |
摘要点击 958 全文点击 167 投稿时间:2024-02-07 修订日期:2024-04-30 |
查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
中文关键词 非期望产出EBM模型 绿色低碳发展 空间关联 最小生成树 QAP方法 |
英文关键词 undesirable output EBM model green and low-carbon development spatial association minimal spanning tree QAP method |
|
中文摘要 |
物流基础设施网络完善和物流低碳转型需求增加,使物流绿色低碳发展表现出明显的空间关联特征,全面评估物流绿色低碳发展的空间关联效应及成因,对促进物流低碳转型和区域协同发展具有重要意义. 基于非期望产出全局EBM模型测度中国各省物流绿色低碳发展水平并揭示其空间关联效应和影响因素. 结果表明:①省际物流绿色低碳发展水平呈现复杂、多线程的空间关联网络,各地区存在显著的空间溢出效应,空间关联网络的通达性和稳定性较好;②省际间物流绿色低碳发展的溢出和受益格局不平衡,东部物流能源消耗和污染产出较低,在低碳物流发展上形成领跑优势,中西部聚集高能耗高污染产业,是绿色低碳发展的关键地区,处于吸收邻近地区绿色物流经济活动的受益阶段;③京津冀、华南和西部陆海新通道沿线省份为经纪人板块,是实现物流高质量发展的重要枢纽,华东和东部沿海为双向溢出板块,处于物流绿色升级的关键阶段,在板块内外起双向“引领”作用,西部为主受益板块,承接东部产业转移,处于绿色技术吸收改进阶段,溢出能力有限;④交通关联密切地区在物流低碳发展上存在竞争效应,产业结构、交通基础设施和政府支持的地区差异增强物流绿色低碳发展的溢出和流动,相似的物流集聚和节能技术水平有助于物流低碳发展空间关联网络的形成. 上述研究为明确各省物流绿色低碳发展程度及区域间的受益和溢出通道,有效发挥交通基础设施和节能技术手段,实现物流绿色低碳区域联动和协同提升提供借鉴参考. |
英文摘要 |
As the logistics infrastructure network constantly improves and the demand for low-carbon transition continues to increase, the green, low-carbon development of the logistics industry has displayed distinctive features of spatial association. Therefore evaluating the effects and causes of spatial association comprehensively and objectively to promote the low-carbon transition of the logistics industry and coordinated development between regions, is important. Based on the global EBM model of undesirable output, this study measured the green, low-carbon development level of inter-provincial logistics in China and revealed the spatial association features of low-carbon development in the logistics industry, as well as the formation mechanism. The research findings are listed below: ① The green, low-carbon development level of inter-provincial logistics showed a complex, multi-threading network of spatial association. Although the green, low-carbon development of the logistics industry in the regions was still at a low level, a significant spatial spillover effect, accompanied by a highly accessible and stable spatial association network was observed. ② An imbalance has been observed in the spillover and benefiting pattern of the green, low-carbon development of inter-provincial logistics. Specifically, the logistics industry in the eastern region, which consumes less energy and produces less pollution, took the lead in the development of low-carbon logistics, whereas energy-intensive and highly polluting industries were concentrated in the central and western regions, which are key regions for green, low-carbon development that are currently at the stage of benefiting from the economic activities of green logistics in nearby regions. ③ The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, southern region, and western provinces along the New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor served as the broker module, which were important hubs for achieving the high-quality development of the logistics industry. The eastern region and coastal areas in the east, as modules with a bidirectional spillover, were at the key stage of green industrial upgradation and played a two-way leading role in and out of the module. The western region, as the major beneficiary module that receives the industrial transfer of the eastern region, was at the stage of green technology absorption and improvement, thus showing a limited spillover capacity currently. ④ The study on the formation mechanism of the spatial association network suggested that regions with close traffic connection displayed competition effects on the low-carbon development of logistics. Regional differences in industrial structures, transportation infrastructure, and government support could enhance the spillover and flow in the green, low-carbon development level of logistics, while similar logistics aggregation and level of energy-saving technology contributed to forming the spatial association network of low-carbon logistics development. The spatial association of the green, low-carbon logistics development still has room for improvement, which makes it necessary to clarify the development level of green, low-carbon logistics in different provinces and the benefiting and spillover pathway between different regions and give full play to traffic infrastructure and energy-saving technologies, to achieve the regional linkage and coordinated improvement of green, low-carbon logistics. |
|
|
|