首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
杭州COVID-19期间大气VOCs体积分数变化特征
摘要点击 2114  全文点击 742  投稿时间:2021-03-24  修订日期:2021-06-23
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)  挥发性有机物(VOCs)  日变化  化学反应活性  臭氧生成潜势(OFP)
英文关键词  COVID-19  volatile organic compounds (VOCs)  daily variation  chemical reactivity  ozone formation potential(OFP)
作者单位E-mail
林旭 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007 1057674326@qq.com 
严仁嫦 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007 331028669@qq.com 
金嘉佳 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007  
许凯儿 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007  
何曦 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007  
叶辉 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007  
何纪平 浙江省杭州生态环境监测中心, 杭州 310007  
中文摘要
      2019年12月1日至2020年3月31日新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)期间,采用Syntech Spectras GC955在线气相色谱仪对杭州市大气环境中挥发性有机物(VOCs)进行了在线连续监测,分析了VOCs的组成特征、日变化规律和大气化学反应活性.结果表明,不同站点疫情前φ(总VOCs)均最高,一级响应期间均最低;夜间φ(总VOCs)普遍高于白天,卧龙桥φ(总VOCs)日变化幅度小于下沙,一级响应期间φ(总VOCs)日变化幅度小于其他3个时期;下沙φ(总VOCs)日变化呈现"V"字型特征,而卧龙桥则呈现出典型的双峰结构;下沙OFP高于卧龙桥,2个点疫情前OFP均最高,下沙一级响应期间OFP最低,卧龙桥二级响应期间OFP最低.下沙芳香烃和烯烃的OFP较高,炔烃OFP最低;卧龙桥烯烃OFP远高于其他3个组分,烷烃次之,炔烃OFP最低.
英文摘要
      A continuous observation campaign was carried out with the Syntech Spectras GC955 volatile organics online monitoring system from December 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020 during the COVID-19 period in Hangzhou. Composition characteristics, diurnal variation, and atmospheric chemical reactivity of VOCs were analyzed. The results showed that φ(total VOCs) were the highest before the COVID-19 pandemic in different sites and the lowest during the first response period. The φ(total VOCs) at night was higher than that during the day. The daily variation in Wolongqiao φ(total VOCs) was less than that in Xiasha. The daily variation in φ(total VOCs) during the first level response period was less than that during the other three periods. The diurnal variation in the φ (total VOCs) in Xiasha showed a "V" shape, and that in Wolongqiao showed a typical bimodal structure. The OFP in Xiasha was higher than that in Wolongqiao. The OFP were the highest at the two sites before the COVID-19 pandemic. The OFP was the lowest during the first response period in Xiasha and the lowest during the second response period in Wolongqiao. The OFP of aromatics and olefins was higher, and the OFP of alkynes was the lowest in Xiasha. The OFP of olefin in Wolongqiao was much higher than that of the other three components, followed by alkane and alkyne.

您是第52685992位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2