| 两种土壤增效剂对稻田氨挥发排放的影响 |
| 摘要点击 2212 全文点击 734 投稿时间：2019-01-23 修订日期：2019-03-11 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 水稻 生物炭 硝化抑制剂 氨挥发 产量 |
| 英文关键词 rice biochar nitrapyrin ammonia volatilization yield |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 周玉玲 | 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 南京 210095
江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 农业部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 | 2197455762@qq.com | | 侯朋福 | 江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 农业部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 | | | 李刚华 | 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 南京 210095 | | | 王绍华 | 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 南京 210095 | | | 杨林章 | 江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 农业部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 | | | 薛利红 | 江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 农业部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室, 南京 210014 | njxuelihong@gmail.com | | 丁艳锋 | 南京农业大学农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室, 南京 210095 | |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 硝化抑制剂和生物炭是农田土壤管理常用的土壤增效剂.其中，硝化抑制剂可以增加作物产量提高氮素利用率，而生物炭是生物质资源利用的一种新方式，且具有一定的吸附特性.以减少稻田氨挥发带来的氮素损失及环境污染问题为目的，在原状土柱模拟试验条件下，以单施化肥处理（CN）为对照，研究了生物炭（B）添加、硝化抑制剂（CP）添加及复合添加处理（BCP）对田面水pH、田面水铵态氮浓度、水稻产量及氨挥发损失的影响.结果表明，两种增效剂施用对水稻产量无显著影响，硝化抑制剂添加有增加水稻产量的趋势.两种土壤增效剂添加均显著增加了稻田氨挥发损失，损失量占施氮量的25%~35%.其中，肥期（施肥后7 d内）氨挥发损失占总损失的86%~91%，是氨挥发损失的主要时期.与CN处理相比，CP处理明显提高了田面水NH4+-N浓度和氨挥发损失，基肥期、穗肥期和非肥期增加效应明显，氨挥发增幅分别为138%、48%和78%，全生育期氨挥发总损失量增加59%.生物炭添加对稻田氨挥发损失也有明显的促进效应，且具有阶段性特征，前期（基肥期和蘖肥期）的增加效应高于后期（穗肥期和穗肥后），田面水NH4+-N浓度和pH也表现出相同的趋势.两者配施添加处理显现出了正交互作用，氨挥发损失量大于单施处理，与化肥处理差异显著.结果说明，生物炭添加不能解决硝化抑制剂添加引起的铵态氮浓度升高和氨挥发损失增加的问题，对于硝化抑制剂添加引起的氨挥发损失增加的问题需要继续研究. |
| 英文摘要 |
| Nitrification inhibitor and biochar are commonly used as soil synergists. Among them, nitrification inhibitor can increase crop yields and N use efficiency, while biochar is a relatively new way of using biomass resources and has certain adsorption characteristics. In order to reduce nitrogen loss and environmental pollution caused by ammonia volatilization in paddy fields, a pot experiment with chemical fertilizer application (CN) as a control was conducted to study the effects of biochar (B), nitrapyrin (CP), and compound application (BCP) on pH, NH4+-N concentration dynamics in the flood water, rice yields, and ammonia volatilization from paddy fields. The results showed that the application of these two synergists had no significant effect on rice yields, and the nitrification inhibitors had a tendency to increase rice yields. The two synergists significantly increased ammonia volatilization from paddy fields, accounting for 25%-35% of the total N rate. Ammonia volatilization during periods of fertilizer application accounted for 86%-91% of the total loss, representing the main period of ammonia volatilization. Compared with the CN treatment, the CP treatment increased NH4+-N concentrations in flood water and the loss of ammonia via volatilization, which was increased by 59.18% and mainly occurred during a week after the basal fertilization(138%) and spike fertilization (48%), and non-fertilization stage (78%). Biochar had a promoting effect on ammonia volatilization with typically phased characteristics. The initial increasing effect of biochar on ammonia volatilization was higher than during the later stages, when NH4+-N concentrations and the pH of flood water showed the same trend. In addition, the coupling of nitrification inhibitor and biochar significantly increased the total loss of ammonia via volatilization loss due to the promotion effect of CP and B. The problem of increased ammonia volatilization loss caused by the application of nitrification inhibitors requires further research. |
|
|
|
