| 间歇曝气SBR与传统SBR处理养猪沼液的比较研究 |
| 摘要点击 2619 全文点击 817 投稿时间：2016-03-03 修订日期：2016-06-02 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 间歇曝气序批式活性污泥法(IASBR) 养猪沼液 总氮 氨氮 碳氮比 |
| 英文关键词 intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (IASBR) digested piggery wastewater total nitrogen ammonia nitrogen COD/TN |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 董宝刚 | 上海师范大学生命与环境科学学院, 上海 200234
浙江清华长三角研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江省水质科学与技术重点实验室, 嘉兴 314006 | dbg1990@163.com | | 宋小燕 | 浙江清华长三角研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江省水质科学与技术重点实验室, 嘉兴 314006 | | | 刘锐 | 浙江清华长三角研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江省水质科学与技术重点实验室, 嘉兴 314006 | liuruitsinghuazj@gmail.com | | 川岸朋树 | 三菱丽阳水处理研发中心, 日本丰桥 4408601 | | | 张永明 | 上海师范大学生命与环境科学学院, 上海 200234 | | | 陈吕军 | 浙江清华长三角研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江省水质科学与技术重点实验室, 嘉兴 314006
清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084 | chenlj@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 采用间歇曝气序批式反应器（intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor，IASBR）和传统序批式反应器（SBR）处理养猪沼液，研究进水中化学需氧量（COD）与总氮（TN）比值（COD/TN）和运行负荷对污染物去除效果的影响.结果表明，在进水COD/TN约为2.2、氨氮负荷为（0.12±0.04）kg·（m3·d）-1时，IASBR中的氨氮、TN和有机物去除率分别为97.2%±4.4%、81.5%±7.5%、88.5%±2.4%，优于SBR的78.3%±19.6%、79.8%±4.9%、86.6%±3.2%；当氨氮负荷提高至（0.18±0.02）kg·（m3·d）-1时，IASBR中的氨氮、TN和有机物去除率略有降低，分别为92.4%±7.3%、77.5%±5.3%、86.4%±2.2%，但仍然优于SBR中的相应去除率78.1%±15.4%、61.8%±11.2%、81.8%±5.6%.在氨氮负荷为（0.20±0.01）kg·（m3·d）-1下，提高进水COD/TN至约3.0，则IASBR和SBR的污染物去除能力较进水COD/TN为2.2时有显著提升，IASBR中氨氮、TN和有机物去除率分别达到99.6%±0.2%、91.5%±2.9%和92.0%±0.9%，仍然高于SBR的90.2%±1.4%、83.0%±1.9%、90.2%±0.5%.总体而言，相较SBR，IASBR对TN和氨氮的去除更高效、耐冲击负荷能力更强，因此对养猪沼液等低碳氮比的废水更为适用. |
| 英文摘要 |
| An intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (IASBR) and a traditional sequencing batch reactor (SBR) were respectively used for treating digested piggery wastewater, and the pollutant removal performance was studied at different ratios of chemical oxygen demand (COD) to total nitrogen (TN) in the influent and different loading rates. The results showed that the pollutant removal rates in the IASBR were much higher than those in the SBR. Under influent COD/TN of about 2.2 and NH4+-N loading of (0.12±0.04) kg·(m3·d)-1, the removal rates of NH4+-N, TN and TOC in the IASBR were 97.2%±4.4%, 81.5%±7.5% and 88.5%±2.4%, respectively, higher than the corresponding rates of 78.3%±19.6%, 79.8%±4.9% and 86.6%±3.2% in the SBR. As the NH4+-N loading was increased to (0.18±0.02) kg·(m3·d)-1, the removal rates of NH4+-N, TN and TOC in the IASBR were slightly decreased to 92.4%±7.3%, 77.5%±5.3% and 86.4%±2.2%, but still higher than the corresponding values of 78.1%±15.4%, 61.8%±11.2% and 81.8%±5.6% in the SBR. As the NH4+-N loading was remained at (0.20±0.01) kg·(m3·d)-1, but the influent COD/TN ratio was increased to about 3.0, the pollutant removal rates in both IASBR and SBR were increased, compared to those at influent COD/TN ratio of 2.2.The removal rates of NH4+-N, TN and TOC in the IASBR were 99.6%±0.2%, 91.5%±2.9% and 92.0%±0.9%, respectively, higher than the corresponding rates of 90.2%±1.4%, 83.0%±1.9% and 90.2%±0.5% in the SBR. Based on the above, the IASBR was more efficient in TN and ammonium removal and more shocking load resistant, and therefore was more feasible than SBR for treating low COD/TN ratio wastewaters such as the digested piggery wastewater. |
|
|
|
