不同水源补给情形的溪流沟渠沉积物磷形态及释放风险分析 |
摘要点击 3481 全文点击 1337 投稿时间:2016-03-24 修订日期:2016-04-15 |
查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
中文关键词 源头溪流 沉积物 磷形态 磷吸附指数(PSI) 磷吸附饱和度(DPS) |
英文关键词 headwater stream sediments phosphorus fractions phosphorus sorption index (PSI) degree of phosphorus saturation (DPS) |
|
中文摘要 |
2015年5~12月,在合肥地区3条分别以城市污水厂尾水、食品加工废水和农业排水-地下水渗流为主要补给水源的溪流沟渠上,按季节采集表层沉积物样,分析沉积物磷赋存形态;通过磷吸附指数(PSI)、磷吸附饱和度(DPS)和磷释放风险指数(ERI)计算,评估溪流沟渠沉积物的磷潜在释放风险,并以非参数检验方法,对3条溪流沟渠开展差异性分析.结果表明:1关镇河支渠和陶冲小溪流水体磷素污染严重,3条溪流沟渠磷污染程度排序为:关镇河支渠 >陶冲小溪流 >磨店小溪流,其中关镇河支渠沉积物TP平均含量为1376.95 mg·kg-1,分别是磨店小溪流和陶冲小溪流的2.94和1.91倍;2 3条溪流沟渠沉积物中各形态磷含量差异显著,且在含量高低排序方面存在一定差异性;3 3条溪流沉积物的PSI值季节性变化特征明显,而且每条溪流沟渠所有采样点变化规律基本一致,即总体上都表现出秋季最高,冬季次之,春、夏季基本相当且相对最低的变化特征;4由PSI、DPS及ERI评估得到的磷释放风险特征基本一致,相应的磷释放风险高低排序为:关镇河支渠 >陶冲小溪流 >磨店小溪流;5差异性分析表明,3条溪流沟渠几乎在所有指标上存在显著的差异性. |
英文摘要 |
From May to September 2015, seasonal sediment samples were collected from three headwater streams and ditches which were discharged from sewage plant tail water, food processing wastewater and agricultural drainage-groundwater seepage, respectively, in Hefei, Chaohu Lake basin. The stream-bed sediments were analyzed for phosphorus fractions. The risk assessment on phosphorus release from sediments was conducted using the phosphorus sorption index (PSI), degree of phosphorus saturation (DPS) and the phosphorus release risk index (ERI). Moreover, nonparametric tests method was used to explore the difference among the three studied streams and ditches. Study results showed that:1 Guanzhenhe Distributary and Taochong Stream were seriously damaged by phosphorus pollution both in waters and stream-bed sediment, and the phosphorus pollution levels could be arranged in the order of Guanzhenhe Distributary >Taochong Stream >Modian Stream. The mean content of total phosphorus (TP) in sediments in Guanzhenhe Distributary was 1376.95 mg·kg-1, which was 2.94 and 1.91 times as high as those of Modian Stream and Taochong Stream, respectively. 2 Significant differences and different sort orders in contents of phosphorus fractions were found for each of the three streams. 3 Obvious seasonal variations existed in PSI for the three streams, and all the sampling points in the same stream had similar changing law, namely, the maximum content emerged in autumn, followed by winter, and the minimum occurred in spring or summer. 4 The same conclusions were drawn in phosphorus release risk according to the PSI, DPS and ERI, and the risk ranked as follows:Guanzhenhe Distributary >Taochong Stream >Modian Stream. 5 According to the difference analysis, significant differences existed in almost all of the indexes among the three streams. |
|
|
|