首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
合肥市区典型景观水体氮磷污染特征及富营养化评价
摘要点击 3727  全文点击 1599  投稿时间:2013-09-21  修订日期:2013-11-01
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  氮磷浓度  景观水体  富营养化  叶绿素浓度  合肥市
英文关键词  nitrogen and phosphorus contents  landscape waters  eutrophication  chlorophyll content  Hefei City
作者单位E-mail
李如忠 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009 Lrz1970@163.com 
刘科峰 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009  
钱靖 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009  
杨继伟 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009  
张翩翩 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009  
中文摘要
      为掌握合肥市环城河水系水环境状况,于2012年9月~2013年7月,在城区选取6个典型景观水体测定水体理化指标和叶绿素浓度,开展水体氮磷污染特征分析及富营养化评价,结果表明:1各水体氮、磷污染较为严重,TN和TP月平均浓度均远超过国际认可的发生水体富营养化临界值;2 南淝河、黑池坝和雨花塘水体氮浓度表现出显著的逐月变化性,南淝河水体TP 和PO43--P一直在较高浓度状态下波动,而银河公园水体则呈现显著的上升趋势;3 雨花塘与黑池坝水体TN/TP比平均值分别为104.7和158.3,包河公园、银河公园、逍遥津公园和南淝河水体分别为16.8、18.7、6.4和16.8,表明雨花塘、黑池坝水体处于磷限制性状态,逍遥津公园为氮限制性状态;4聚类分析将 6个景观水体聚为两大类,即污染严重的黑池坝和南淝河归为一类,其余4个相对封闭的水体为另一类;5营养状态指数 评价结果表明,所有水体均处于富营养化状态,且富营养化程度排序为:银河公园>黑池坝>南淝河>逍遥津公园>雨花塘>包河公园.
英文摘要
      To understand the water environment regimes of the city-circling water system in Hefei City, six typical landscape waters were chosen to investigate pollution characteristics of nitrogen and phosphate and evaluate water eutrophication level according to the monitoring data of water physicochemical characteristics and chlorophyll content from September 2012 to July 2013. Study results showed that 1 the six waters mentioned above have been seriously polluted by nitrogen and phosphorus loadings, with the monthly mean values of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations far exceeding the universally accepted threshold values of water eutrophication; 2 the nitrogen contents in the waters of Nanfeihe River, Heichiba and Yuhuatang scenic spots exhibited a markedly monthly variation, and both TP and PO43--P in Nanfeihe River showed a fluctuated characteristic with high concentrations while presenting a significant upward trend in Yuhuatang scenic spot; 3 the average values of TN/TP ratios for Yuhuatang and Heichiba scenic spots were 104.7 and 158.3, respectively, and the ratios for Baohe Park, Yinhe Park, Xiaoyaojin Park, and city segment of Nanfeihe River were 16.8, 18.7, 6.4 and 16.8, respectively, indicating that the scenic waters of Yuhuatang and Heichiba were phosphate-limited whereas Xiaoyaojin Park was nitrogen-limited; 4 all the six scenic waters were, in general, subsumed under just two broad categories, namely Hechiba scenic spot and Nanfeihe River, which were seriously polluted, and clustered together, and the others fall into the second class; and 5 water eutrophication appraisal result indicated that the six waters were all in the state of eutrophication, and could be arranged in the order of eutrophication level, Yinhe Park>Heichiba scenic spot>city segment of Nanfeihe River>Xiaoyaojin Park>Yuhuatang scenic spot>Baohe Park.

您是第53197813位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2