首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
洪泽湖表层沉积物重金属分布特征及其风险评价
摘要点击 3500  全文点击 2834  投稿时间:2010-02-23  修订日期:2010-04-18
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  洪泽湖  表层沉积物  重金属  空间分布  潜在生态风险
英文关键词  Hongze Lake  surface sediments  heavy metals  distribution  potential ecological risk
作者单位
余辉 中国环境科学研究院湖泊生态环境创新基地北京100012 
张文斌 中国环境科学研究院湖泊生态环境创新基地北京100012吉林建筑工程学院市政与环境工程学院长春130021 
余建平 湖南省永州职业技术学院永州425000 
中文摘要
      为了揭示洪泽湖表层沉积物重金属的空间分布特征,用电感耦合等离子发射光谱法和原子荧光法测定了10个点位的重金属元素含量,分析了其空间分布特性,并评价了其潜在生态风险.洪泽湖表层沉积物中Cu、Zn、Pb、Cd、Cr、Hg和As平均含量分别为34.99、 72.44、 18.82、 3.24、 57.59、 0.07和23.67 mg/kg,Fe、Al和Mn平均含量分别为29.63、 37.19和0.69 mg/g,各重金属元素空间分布特性极为相似,空间差异较大.受河流冲刷等水动力学条件及湖盆地形的影响,重金属元素入湖口附近含量远低于出湖口;而在敞水区及水流滞留的湖湾区及汴河、安河入湖河口及其附近区域含量较高,形成3个明显的重金属含量相对较高区域.沉积物中重金属的富集属典型的Turbidity Flood Model方式.重金属Cu、Zn、Pb、Cd、Fe、Al、Mn、As、Cr含量呈显著正相关,表明这些元素污染具有同源性.采用地积累指数(geoaccumulation index,Igeo)和Hakanson潜在生态风险指数对沉积物重金属的污染现状和潜在生态风险程度的评价表明,重金属污染程度顺序依次为Cd>As>Cu>Cr>Zn>Hg>Pb;单个重金属潜在生态风险顺序为:Cd>As>Hg>Cu>Pb>Cr>Zn;Cd污染程度达到中污染程度,生态风险程度达到较重风险程度,其余重金属污染状况相对较轻;Cd单项潜在生态风险区域及全湖综合潜在生态风险区域完全一致.重金属污染可能存在的主要风险区域为:敞水区(S9)及出湖河口附近(S1、S8)风险区、北部湖湾(S6)风险区及西部湖湾(S5)风险区.
英文摘要
      In order to investigated horizontal distribution patterns of heavy metals in surface sediments of Hongze Lake, heavy metal contents in every samples were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) and Atomic Fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) and the potential ecological risks of each heavy metals were analyzed. The average contents of heavy metals Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, Hg, As, Fe, Al and Mn are 34.99  mg/kg, 72.44  mg/kg, 18.82  mg/kg, 3.24  mg/kg, 57.59  mg/kg, 0.07  mg/kg, 23.67 mg/kg, 29.63  mg/g, 37.19  mg/g and 0.69 mg/g, respectively. Horizontal distribution patterns of every heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Fe, Al, Cr, Hg, Mn and As) in surface sediments were very similar. By impact of hydodynamical and topographical condition, the contents of heavy metals were significantly lower in the inflow river mouth areas than that of open water area in the eastern part of the lake, and that of bays and outflow river mouth areas. This distribution pattern belongs to Turbidity Flood Model. These heavy metals are highly related with each other positively, indicating that they are from the same pollution source. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and the Hakanson potential ecological risk index were applied for assessing the status of sediment heavy metal enrichment and the extent of potential ecological risk. The pollution extent of heavy metals followed the order: Cd>As>Cu>Cr>Zn>Hg>Pb, while the single potential ecological risk of heavy metals followed the order: Cd>As>Hg>Cu>Pb>Cr>Zn. The pollution extent and potential ecological risk of Cd were the most serious among all heavy metals. The distribution pattern of Cd individual potential ecological risk indices is exactly the same as that of general potential ecological risk indices for all heavy metals, indicating the important contribution of Cd in the general indices. Analysis showed that heavy metal pollution and the potential ecological risk existed in three risk regions: the central open water area and outflow river mouth region (S9, S1 and S8), the northern bay region (S6) and the western bay region (S5).

您是第53178111位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2