| 缓释复合肥在不同土壤水分条件下氨挥发特性研究 |
| 摘要点击 1312 全文点击 760 投稿时间：2009-10-09 修订日期：2010-02-08 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 缓释肥料 氨挥发 通气法 动力学特性 土壤水分 |
| 英文关键词 slow release fertilizer ammonia volatilization venting method kinetics characteristics soil moisture |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 采用“通气法”室内培养试验研究了非包膜缓释复合肥(SRF)在不同土壤水分条件下的氨挥发损失状况和动力学特性以及盆栽试验条件下水稻生长和氮素利用效率.结果表明，SRF在淹水条件下氨挥发比不淹水处理提前3～4d到达峰值；且峰值和累积氨挥发量也比不淹水培养条件下高.与普通复合肥（CCF）相比，缓释复合肥的氨挥发损失量显著降低，不淹水条件下比等氮量CCF减少氨挥发50.6%和22.8%，淹水条件下比等氮量CCF减少氨挥发24.2%和10.4%，但是其氨挥发损失显著高于包膜缓释肥料（CRF）.SRF的氨累积挥发量随施肥水平的增加而增大，其动力学特性可用一级动力学方程、Elovich方程和抛物线扩散方程定量描述.SRF、CCF 和 CRF各施肥处理在淹水条件下的水稻植株生物量分别比不淹水条件增加67.86%、 78.25%和48.75%；氮素利用率分别比不淹水处理增加57.73%、 80.70%和12.06%.在不淹水和淹水2种土壤水分条件下，施用SRF处理氮素利用率分别比CCF增加59.10%和10.40%.SRF能够降低氨挥发，提高植株生物量和氮素利用率. |
| 英文摘要 |
| By using Venting method incubation experiment, we studied the ammonia volatilization and kinetics characteristics of uncoated slowed release compound fertilizer (SRF) under different soil water conditions and the growth and nitrogen utilization efficiency of rice in pot experiment. Results indicated that the ammonia volatilization of SRF under waterflooding reached the peak ahead of 3-4 days compared to the moist treatment. The peak and accumulation of ammonia volatilization in the waterflooding treatments were higher than those under the moist condition. SRF could significantly reduce total ammonia volatilization compared to the common compound fertilizer (CCF), reduced by 50.6% and 22.8% in the moist treatment and reduced by 24.2% and 10.4% in the waterflooding treatment，but the loss of ammonia volatilization of SRF was higher significantly than that of the coated fertilizer(CRF). Ammonia volatilization increased with the increasing of fertilizer application. The dynamics of ammonia volatilization of SRF could be quantitatively described with three equations: the first order kinetics equation, Elovich equation and parabola equation.Compared to moist condition, the biomass of rice plant in SRF, CCF and SRF treatments increased by 67.86%, 78.25% and 48.75%, and nitrogen utilization efficiency increased by 57.73%, 80.70% and 12.06% under waterflooding condition, respectively. Comparing with CCF, nitrogen utilization efficiency in SRF treatment improved by 59.10% and 10.40% under two soil moisture conditions. SRF could reduce ammonia volatilization and improve biomass and nitrogen utilization efficiency. |
