首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
PCR-DGGE分析啤酒废水生物处理工艺的微生物区系
摘要点击 2006  全文点击 1202  投稿时间:2007-10-19  修订日期:2008-02-27
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  啤酒废水  PCR-DGGE  生物处理  微生物区系
英文关键词  beer wastewater  PCR-DGGE  biological treatment  microbial community
作者单位
赵继红 河南工业大学化学化工学院郑州450001 
何淑英 华东师范大学资源与环境科学学院上海200062 
李继香 同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室上海200092 
刘永德 河南工业大学化学化工学院郑州450001 
楼燕 河南工业大学化学化工学院郑州450001 
中文摘要
      应用基于16S rDNA 的PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)技术对啤酒废水“水解酸化+SBR”工艺的微生物多样性进行研究.分别取水解酸化池与SBR池中不同深度以及不同处理时段的活性污泥,提取样品总DNA,通过PCR扩增、变性梯度凝胶电泳,将16S rDNA(V3区)的PCR扩增片段割胶克隆测序确定样品中的微生物群落,与筛选出的高效菌株进行对比分析.结果表明,水解酸化池中的微生物群落随深度的改变,在结构组成和种群数量上均有较大差异,2 m深处微生物群落相对丰富,优势条带突出;SBR池不同深度微生物种群结构一致,沉淀期、进水期和曝气期不同处理时段的微生物种类一致,但优势菌群不同;所测序列y2、23、25、31、h5和15号分别与菌株uncultured Thermotogales sp.、Comamonas sp. WT OTU1、Agrobacterium tumefaciens、Bacillus subtilis、Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus、Comamonas testosteroni有高度同源性,活性污泥样品中的优势条带与高效菌株的序列不同,表明筛选出的高效菌并非为实际处理过程中的优势菌.
英文摘要
      The microbial community structure of beer wastewater treatment plants with hydrolyze-acidification and SBR process was studied by PCR amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) based 16S rDNA. Activated sludge samples were collected from both hydrolyze-acidification tank and SBR tank at different depth and disposal period. The total DNA was extracted and the 16S rDNA was amplified by universal primer. The microbial community structure was analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, compared with the DGGE band pattern of the screened high efficient bacteria. The PCR products were cloned and sequenced to analyze the microbial community in phylogenic evolution. The DGGE pattern showed that the microbial community in hydrolyze-acidification tank changed with the variation of depth both in microbial structure and population, and at the depth of two-meter the microbial community was relatively rich, the dominant bands were notable. The microbial community in SBR tank at different depths and different disposal periods (precipitation period, inflow period, aeration period) were consistent respectively, but the dominant bands were different. Sequences of y2, 23, 25, 31, h5, 15 yielded high homogeneity with the strains uncultured Thermotogales sp., Comamonas sp. WT OTU1, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, Comamonas testosteroni from GenBank. The 16S rDNA sequences of the dominant bands were not completely same with that of the high efficient bacteria, which indicated that the strains screened were not the dominant strains in actual process.

您是第53512614位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2