首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
长江上游岸线(重庆段)生态修复分区及诊断
摘要点击 232  全文点击 2  投稿时间:2025-05-27  修订日期:2025-08-02
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  生态修复分区  生态脆弱性  生态安全格局  电路理论  长江上游岸线
英文关键词  territorial ecological restoration zoning  ecological vulnerability  ecological security pattern  circuit theory  the upper reaches of the Yangtze River shoreline
DOI  10.13227/j.hjkx.202505307
作者单位E-mail
鄂施璇 重庆工商大学公共管理学院, 重庆 400067 eshixuan@ctbu.edu.cn 
黄丹妮 重庆工商大学公共管理学院, 重庆 400067  
王兆林 重庆工商大学成渝地区双城经济圈建设研究院, 重庆 400067 wzhaolin@163.com 
高梦颖 重庆工商大学公共管理学院, 重庆 400067  
中文摘要
      探讨长江上游岸线(重庆段)生态修复分区及诊断,为区域国土空间生态修复提供科学依据. 采用“敏感-恢复-阻力”(SRP)模型对2010~2023年的长江上游岸线(重庆段)进行生态脆弱性评价,运用形态空间格局分析(MSPA)、最小累积阻力模型(MCR)和电路理论等方法构建生态安全格局,基于生态脆弱性评价和生态安全格局构建进行生态修复分区,并提出诊断策略. 结果表明:①2010~2023年,生态脆弱性指数整体呈上升趋势,中度及以上生态脆弱区占95.86%,高度、重度脆弱区多集中在重庆市主城区和各区县的中心城区所在岸线. ②研究区共识别17处生态源地,面积达155.10 km2;25条生态廊道,总长度达438.46 km;12处生态夹点,集中分布在重庆市主城区所处岸线;39处生态障碍点,多分布在云阳至奉节段. ③生态修复分区可分为重点保护区、自主保护区、重点修复区和生态整治区这4类,并针对不同分区提出诊断策略,可为长江上游生态系统保护与修复提供参考.
英文摘要
      Exploring the ecological restoration zoning and diagnosis of the territorial space of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River shoreline in the Chongqing section could provide a scientific basis for regional land space ecological restoration. This study used the “sensitivity-resilience-pressure” (SRP) model to evaluate the ecological vulnerability of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River shoreline in the Chongqing section from 2010 to 2023 and used various methods to construct the ecological security pattern, including morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA), minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model, circuit theory, and others. Based on the ecological vulnerability assessment and ecological security pattern construction, this study carried out the territorial ecological restoration zoning and proposed diagnostic strategies. ① From 2010 to 2023, the ecological vulnerability index showed an overall upward trend, with moderate and above ecological vulnerable areas accounting for 95.86%. Highly and severely vulnerable areas were primarily concentrated in the main urban area of Chongqing and along the shorelines of the central urban areas of districts and counties. ② The study identified 17 ecological sources totaling 155.10 km2 in area, 25 ecological corridors with a total length of 438.46 km, 12 ecological pinch points concentrated in the shoreline of Chongqing's main urban area, and 39 ecological barriers predominantly located in the shoreline from Yunyang to Fengjie section. ③ There were four categories of ecological restoration zoning, including key protection areas, independent protection areas, key restoration areas, and ecological remediation areas. This paper proposed diagnostic strategies for different zones to provide references for the protection and restoration of ecosystems in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River.

您是第157936970位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2