首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
河南省地表水源中PPCPs分布及生态风险评价
摘要点击 3931  全文点击 1258  投稿时间:2020-05-22  修订日期:2020-07-21
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  药物及个人护理品(PPCPs)  饮用水水源  河南省  污染分布  生态风险评价
英文关键词  pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs)  drinking water sources  Henan province  pollution distribution  ecological risk assessment
作者单位E-mail
周颖 河海大学浅水湖泊综合治理与资源开发教育部重点实验室, 南京 210098 njlhzhouying@163.com 
吴东海 河海大学浅水湖泊综合治理与资源开发教育部重点实验室, 南京 210098  
陆光华 河海大学浅水湖泊综合治理与资源开发教育部重点实验室, 南京 210098 ghlu@hhu.edu.cn 
姚晶晶 西藏农牧学院水利土木工程学院, 林芝 860000  
魏磊 河南省水文水资源局, 郑州 450004  
韩枫 河南省水文水资源局, 郑州 450004  
中文摘要
      新兴污染物药物及个人护理品(pharmaceuticals and personal care products,PPCPs)在水环境中的赋存会对水生生物产生不良影响,饮水水源地PPCPs的存在更可能对人类健康造成危害.对河南省5个代表性饮用水水源中PPCPs的污染赋存进行了采样调查,并进行了相关的溯源分析和生态风险评价.结果表明,20种PPCPs在采样点检出累积浓度范围为24.2~317.6 ng·L-1.其中,咖啡因(CFI)最高浓度达186.4 ng·L-1,其次为磺胺甲噁唑(SMX)和氧氟沙星(OFC),最高检出浓度分别为70.8 ng·L-1和24.2 ng·L-1.黑岗口水源地PPCPs污染水平高于其他水源地.通过不稳定化合物CFI与稳定化合物卡马西平(CBZ)浓度比值分析了PPCPs来源,水源地上游水体受污水排污污染以及水源地周边分散式生活污水面源污染可能是污染物主要来源.风险商(RQ)计算结果表明,各水源地检出的PPCPs对藻类呈现出中等到高风险,对无脊椎动物和鱼类呈现出低风险到中等风险,需要对相关的污染控制引起重视.
英文摘要
      The occurrence of emerging pollutants pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in aquatic environments has potential adverse effects on aquatic organisms, and the presence of PPCPs in drinking water sources is very likely to cause harm to human health. The PPCPs pollution in five typical drinking water sources in Henan province was investigated. Moreover, the source of pollutants was analyzed and the relevant ecological risks were evaluated. The results showed that the cumulative concentrations of 20 PPCPs at different sampling sites ranged from 24.2 to 317.6 ng·L-1. Caffeine (CFI) was the highest level contaminant, with the concentration up to 186.4 ng·L-1, followed by sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and ofloxacin (OFC), with detected concentrations up to 70.8 ng·L-1 and 24.2 ng·L-1, respectively. The pollution of PPCPs in Heigangkou drinking water sources was higher than those of other drinking water sources. The comparation of the labile indicator CFI and the conservative indicator carbamazepine (CBZ) concentrations implies that the pollutions from the upstream water and around scattered domestic sewage might be responsible for the PPCPs present in these drinking water sources. The risk quotient (RQ) calculation results indicated that the detected PPCPs in 5 drinking water sources have moderate to high risks to algae, while low to moderate risks to invertebrates and fish. Therefore, attention should be paid to relevant pollution control.

您是第75723341位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2