| 粤桂水源地有机氯农药的污染特征及生态风险 |
| 摘要点击 2277 全文点击 975 投稿时间：2015-10-15 修订日期：2016-01-20 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 粤桂水源地 有机氯农药 污染特征 物种敏感度分布 安全阈值法 生态风险评价 |
| 英文关键词 water source areas of Guangdong and Guangxi organochlorine pesticides pollution characteristics species sensitive distribution(SSD) margin of safety ecological risk assessment |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 利用固相萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术(SPE-GC-MS)检测了粤桂水源地7个采样点水样中16种有机氯农药(OCPs)的浓度,分析了研究区OCPs的污染特征;利用BurrⅢ型分布构建了8种OCPs的物种敏感度分布曲线,并计算出不同OCPs对淡水水生生物的HC5(hazardous concentration for 5% species)值,最后应用安全阈值法评价了OCPs对水生生物的生态风险.结果表明,OCPs的浓度在6.64~34.19 ng·L-1之间,平均值为16.76 ng·L-1,HCHs和DDTs及其降解产物在污染物中的贡献比例较大. HCHs主要来自家庭杀虫剂中的林丹,DDTs主要来自三氯杀螨醇的污染或历史残留.脊椎动物对OCPs的耐受性高于无脊椎动物,α-硫丹对水生植物和微生物的影响较大,p, p'-DDT对脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的影响较大.粤桂水源地OCPs对水生生物没有显著的生态风险,但DDTs和α-硫丹对水生生物存在较高的潜在风险,应加以重视. |
| 英文摘要 |
| The concentrations of 16 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in 7 water samples collected from different sites of water source areas of Guangdong and Guangxi were detected by SPE-GC-MS, and then the pollution characteristics were analyzed. This study established species sensitivity distribution(SSD) curves with BurrⅢ distribution model. In the meantime, HC5 values were calculated by BurrliOZ software, which were used to evaluate the toxicity effects of OCPs towards aquatic organisms. Finally, margin of safety concentration values were calculated to assess the ecological risk. The results showed that the concentration of OCPs varied from 6.64 to 34.19 ng·L-1, with a mean value of 16.76 ng·L-1, while HCHs and DDTs contributed a lot. HCHs were predominately originated from lindane, which is a component in household insecticide, while DDTs were from dicofol contamination or historical residues. Vertebrates could stand severer toxicity in comparison with invertebrates. α-endosulfan showed a greater toxicity towards aquatic plants and microorganisms than others, while p, p'-DDT turned out to be the most hazardous pollutant to vertebrates and invertebrates among the 16 OCPs studied. Generally speaking, OCPs in study areas didn't show conspicuous ecological risks towards aquatic organisms, DDTs and α-endosulfan, however, are still worth paying close attention due to their high potential risks. |
|
|
|
