首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
西安市采暖季过渡期高时间分辨率细颗粒物组分特征及来源解析
摘要点击 3047  全文点击 67  投稿时间:2023-06-22  修订日期:2023-08-01
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  大气细颗粒物  组分特征  形成机制  来源解析  污染成因
英文关键词  atmospheric fine particulate matter  components characteristics  formation mechanism  source apportionment  pollution causes
作者单位E-mail
李萌津 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院, 西安 710055
中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061 
limengjin1998@xauat.edu.cn 
张勇 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061  
张倩 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院, 西安 710055 zhangqian2018@xauat.edu.cn 
田杰 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061
陕西关中平原区域生态环境变化与综合治理国家野外科学观测研究站, 西安 710061 
 
李丽 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061  
刘卉昆 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061  
冉伟康 陕西关中平原区域生态环境变化与综合治理国家野外科学观测研究站, 西安 710061  
王启元 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710061
陕西关中平原区域生态环境变化与综合治理国家野外科学观测研究站, 西安 710061 
 
中文摘要
      受到供暖影响,北方城市秋冬季的大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度升高,空气污染加剧.利用气溶胶化学组分监测仪、七波段黑碳仪以及大气多金属元素在线监测仪于2019年10月25日至11月17日在西安市开展高时间分辨率PM2.5化学组分在线监测,分析采暖季过渡期PM2.5污染特征,同时结合正定矩阵因子分解模型解析PM2.5来源.结果表明,观测期间ρ(PM2.5)平均值为(78.3 ± 38.5)μg·m-3,主要化学组分为有机物(OA)、二次无机离子(SIA)和粉尘,其占比分别为38.7%、31.6%和21.2%,其中ρ(SO42-)、ρ(NO3-)和ρ(NH4+)平均值分别为(4.0 ± 3.1)、(14.9 ± 13.7)和(5.8 ± 4.8)μg·m-3,主要金属ρ(K)、ρ(Ca)和ρ(Fe)平均值分别为(1.0 ± 0.4)、(1.5 ± 1.1)和(1.4 ± 0.9)μg·m-3,BC(贡献率为5.7%)、Cl-(贡献率为1.3%)及微量元素(贡献率为1.5%)对PM2.5的贡献率相对较低.在污染发展和维持阶段,OA和SIA浓度的增加幅度可达137.7%~537.0%,在污染消散阶段则仅有粉尘浓度呈增长之势.来源解析结果显示二次源、生物质燃烧源、扬尘源、机动车源、工业源和燃煤源是观测期间PM2.5的主要来源,分别贡献了29.1%、21.1%、15.3%、12.9%、11.4%和10.2%,其中二次源和生物质燃烧源在污染发展和维持阶段贡献率较高,扬尘源在污染消散阶段贡献率较高.
英文摘要
      Influenced by heating, the concentration of atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM2.5) rises in autumn and winter in northern cities. In this study, Q-ACSM, AE33, and Xact 625 were used to carry out online monitoring of PM2.5 chemical components with high time resolution in Xi'an from October 25 to November 17, 2019, to analyze the characteristics of PM2.5 pollution during the transition period of the heating season. Additionally, we analyzed the sources of PM2.5 in combination with the positive matrix factorization model. The results showed that the average PM2.5 concentration during the observation period was (78.3 ± 38.5) μg·m-3, and the main chemical components were organic matter (OA), secondary inorganic ions (SIA), and dust, which accounted for 38.7%, 31.6%, and 21.2%, respectively. The average concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium were (4.0 ± 3.1), (14.9 ± 13.7), and (5.8 ± 4.8) μg·m-3, and the average concentrations of the major metals potassium, calcium, and iron were (1.0 ± 0.4), (1.5 ± 1.1), and (1.4 ± 0.9) μg·m-3. Black carbon, chloride ions, and trace elements contributed relatively little to PM2.5 (5.7%, 1.3%, and 1.5%, respectively). In the pollution development and maintenance stage, the concentration of OA and SIA increased by 137.7% to 537.0%, whereas in the pollution dissipation stage, only the concentration of dust gradually increased. The source apportionment results showed that secondary sources, biomass burning, dust, vehicle emission, industrial emission, and coal combustion were the main sources of PM2.5 during the observation period, contributing 29.1%, 21.1%, 15.3%, 12.9%, 11.4%, and 10.2%, respectively. The contribution rate of secondary sources and biomass burning was higher in the pollution development and maintenance stage, and dust was higher in the pollution dissipation stage.

您是第53337700位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2