| 数字普惠金融对农业碳生产率的影响 |
| 摘要点击 872 全文点击 10 投稿时间:2025-08-17 修订日期:2025-10-15 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 数字普惠金融 农业碳排放 农业碳生产率 农业低碳转型 空间杜宾模型 |
| 英文关键词 digital financial inclusion agricultural carbon emission agricultural carbon productivity low-carbon transformation in agriculture spatial Durbin model |
| DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.202508157 |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 厘清数字普惠金融对农业碳生产率的影响,对促进农业低碳转型,实现“双碳”目标具有重要意义. 基于2011~2022年中国30个省域的面板数据,在厘清中国省域农业碳生产率现状特征的基础上,实证检验了数字普惠金融对农业碳生产率的影响. 结果发现:①农业碳生产率省际差异明显,其中以山东最高、青海最低;考察期内除上海之外的余下29个省域的农业碳生产率均表现出了明显上升态势. ②总体来看,数字普惠金融发展对农业碳生产率提升具有显著的正向影响,即数字普惠金融水平越高,农业碳生产率越高. ③维度异质性方面,金融使用深度对农业碳生产率具有显著的正向影响,金融覆盖广度和普惠金融数字化水平则不显著;区域异质性方面,数字普惠金融在中、西部和非粮食主产区对农业碳生产率具有显著的正向影响,在东部与粮食主产区则不显著. ④空间溢出效应分析表明,区域内农业碳生产率同时受到当地及相邻地区数字普惠金融发展的影响,即空间溢出效应为正. |
| 英文摘要 |
| Empirically examining the nexus between digital financial inclusion and agricultural carbon productivity provides critical insights for synergizing low-carbon agricultural transformation with China's “dual carbon” strategic objectives. Leveraging a provincial panel dataset (2011-2022, N=30), this study empirically tested the influence of digital financial inclusion on agricultural carbon productivity based on clarifying the characteristics of agricultural carbon productivity in Chinese provinces. The findings reveal that: ① There were obvious differences in agricultural carbon productivity among provinces, among which Shandong was the highest, and Qinghai was the lowest. During the investigation period, the agricultural carbon productivity of the remaining 29 provinces except Shanghai showed an obvious upward trend. ② The development of digital inclusive finance had a significant positive impact on the improvement of agricultural carbon productivity, that is, the higher the level of digital inclusive finance, the higher the agricultural carbon productivity. ③ Dimensionally, financial usage depth exhibited a statistically significant positive effect on agricultural carbon productivity, while neither coverage breadth nor digitization level demonstrated significant associations. In terms of regional heterogeneity, digital financial inclusion in the central, western, and non-major grain-producing regions had a significant positive impact on agricultural carbon productivity, while it had no significant impact in the eastern region and major grain-producing regions. ④ The analysis of spatial spillover effects indicated that agricultural carbon productivity within a region was simultaneously influenced by the development of digital financial inclusion in both the local province and neighboring provinces, demonstrating a positive spatial spillover effect. |