| AnMBR-A-MBR和A2-MBR工艺处理焦化废水效果与急性毒性物质特征对比 |
| 摘要点击 2347 全文点击 928 投稿时间：2017-03-21 修订日期：2017-04-26 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 焦化废水 厌氧膜生物反应器 MBR工艺 对比分析 急性毒性 |
| 英文关键词 coking wastewater anaerobic membrane bioreactor MBR process comparative analysis acute toxicity |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 焦化废水含高浓度难降解有机物，生物处理是应用最为广泛的方法.为探索并提高焦化废水生物处理的去除效果，采用实验室构建的厌氧膜生物反应器/缺氧/好氧膜生物反应器（AnMBR-A-MBR）与厌氧/缺氧/好氧膜生物反应器（A2-MBR）工艺处理实际焦化废水，对比了两套处理工艺在最佳工况下稳定运行对主要污染物的去除效果和对不同污染负荷的稳定性.采用固相萃取和组分分离、发光细菌Q67测试和三维荧光扫描等手段，对二者各级出水的急性毒性分布和变化以及毒性物质特征进行了研究.结果表明，AnMBR的有机污染物去除率为15.3%，显著高于A2-MBR系统的厌氧段（3.4%），AnMBR-A-MBR系统能够抵抗更高的污染负荷.AnMBR-A-MBR系统各级出水的急性毒性均明显低于A2-MBR系统，二者毒性当量总去除率分别为85.2%和79.2%.各级出水中极性组分的急性毒性最强，极性和弱极性组分贡献了绝大部分毒性当量.各级出水的急性毒性主要来自Ⅱ区芳香族蛋白类似物，且Ⅱ区芳香族蛋白类似物可能是极性组分中主要的急性毒性物质. |
| 英文摘要 |
| Coking wastewater contains high-strength refractory organic pollutants and is commonly treated by biological treatment processes. To improve the efficiency of biological treatment, two laboratory scale processes, anaerobic membrane bioreactor/anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR-A-MBR) and anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor (A2-MBR), were developed for coking wastewater treatment. The removal of main pollutants and the stability of different pollutant loadings were compared under the optimum operating conditions. Acute toxicity distribution, variations, and toxic matter characteristics of the two processes were investigated by solid-phase extraction, components separation, the luminous bacteria Q67 test, and three-dimensional fluorescence spectrometry. The results showed that the organic pollutant removal rate of AnMBR was 15.3%, which was significantly higher than the anaerobic stage of the A2-MBR system (3.4%), and the AnMBR-A-MBR system had greater resistance to pollutant loading. Acute toxicity of AnMBR-A-MBR system in each stage effluent was lower than the A2-MBR system and the total toxic unit removal rate of both were 85.2% and 79.2%, respectively. The acute toxicity of the polar component in each stage effluent was the highest, and the polar and mid-polar components contributed to the majority of the toxicity. The toxicity of each stage effluent mainly originated from Region Ⅱ aromatic protein analogues, which could be the main acute toxicity substances of the polar component. |
|
|
|
