首页  |  本刊简介  |  编委会  |  投稿须知  |  订阅与联系  |  微信  |  出版道德声明  |  Ei收录本刊数据  |  封面
天津市春季样方法道路扬尘碳组分特征及来源分析
摘要点击 1625  全文点击 609  投稿时间:2018-11-29  修订日期:2019-01-12
查看HTML全文 查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词  天津市  道路扬尘  PM2.5  PM10  碳组分  来源解析
英文关键词  Tianjin  road dust  PM2.5  PM10  carbon components  source apportionment
作者单位E-mail
马妍 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350 1264101582@qq.com 
姬亚芹 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350 jiyaqin@nankai.edu.cn 
国纪良 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350  
赵静琦 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350  
李越洋 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350  
王士宝 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350  
张蕾 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350  
中文摘要
      为研究天津市春季道路扬尘PM2.5和PM10中碳组分特征及来源,于2015年4月用样方法采集天津市道路扬尘样品,利用再悬浮采样器将样品悬浮到滤膜上,经热光碳分析仪测定有机碳(OC)和元素碳(EC),利用非参数检验、OC/EC比值分析、相关分析及聚类分析对其污染特征和来源进行探讨.结果表明,PM2.5ω(TC)为4.89%(次干道)~18.83%(快速路),ω(OC)为3.57%(次干道)~15.39%(快速路),ω(EC)为1.32%(次干道)~3.44%(快速路);PM10ω(TC)为8.14%(次干道)~19.71%(快速路),ω(OC)为5.91%(次干道)~16.28%(快速路),ω(EC)为1.96%(主干道)~3.43%(快速路);快速路中各碳组分质量分数均较高,次干道中各碳组分质量分数均较低,可能是由于快速路中车流量较大,机动车尾气排放量较大,而次干道车流量较小;各类型道路中ω(OC)明显大于ω(EC),ω(EC)在不同道路类型中差异不大;两相关样本非参数检验表明,各碳组分质量分数在PM2.5和PM10间均无显著性差异;相关性分析表明道路扬尘中OC、EC来源大致相同.通过OC/EC比值分析及聚类分析可知,天津市春季道路扬尘中碳组分主要来源于燃煤、机动车尾气以及生物质燃烧.
英文摘要
      In order to study the characteristics and sources of carbon fractions in PM2.5 and PM10 of road dust in Tianjin, samples of road dust were collected by the quadrat sampling method in April 2015 in Tianjin, and samples were re-suspended on filters by using a NK-ZXF sampler. A Thermal Optical Carbon Analyzer (IMPROVE-TOR) was employed to measure the concentrations of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and the pollution characteristics and sources were investigated by non-parametric tests and OC/EC ratio, correlation, and cluster analyses. The results showed that ω(total carbon, TC) in PM2.5 of road dust amounted to 4.89% (secondary road) -18.83% (expressway), ω(OC) amounted to 3.57% (secondary road) -15.39% (expressway), and ω(EC) amounted to 1.32% (secondary road) -3.44% (expressway); meanwhile, ω(TC) in PM10 of road dust was 8.14% (secondary road) -19.71% (expressway), ω(OC) was 5.91% (secondary road) -16.28% (expressway), and ω(EC) was 1.96% (main road) -3.43% (expressway). The mass fraction of each carbon component for the expressway was relatively high, and that for the secondary trunk road was relatively low, which may have been due to the large traffic volume on the expressway and corresponding large amounts of exhaust emissions from motor vehicles, whereas there were fewer vehicles on the secondary trunk road. Additionally, ω(OC) was significantly larger than ω(EC) for all types of roads, and ω(EC) did not vary much among the different road types. The non-parametric tests of two related samples showed that there was no significant difference in the mass fraction of each carbon component between PM2.5 and PM10. The correlation analysis showed that the sources of OC and EC in road dust were roughly the same. The OC/EC ratio analysis and cluster analysis showed that the main sources of the carbon components in the dust of roads in Tianjin in spring were coal combustion, motor vehicle exhaust, and biomass burning.

您是第51731940位访客
主办单位:中国科学院生态环境研究中心 单位地址:北京市海淀区双清路18号
电话:010-62941102 邮编:100085 E-mail: hjkx@rcees.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计  京ICP备05002858号-2