| 气-水界面对病毒静态吸附实验结果的影响 |
| 摘要点击 1721 全文点击 984 投稿时间：2007-01-13 修订日期：2007-04-24 |
| 查看HTML全文
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词 MS2 土壤 气-水界面 静态吸附 |
| 英文关键词 MS2 soils air-water interface adsorption |
|
| 中文摘要 |
| 气-水界面存在可能导致不能正确评价土壤对病毒的静态吸附能力.本研究通过室内一次平衡法实验，比较分析气-水界面对噬菌体MS2在不同处理（非灭菌/灭菌）的不同土壤中的吸附实验结果影响，同时评价不同程度气-水界面对没有土壤存在时的病毒回收率影响.结果表明，气-水界面存在对吸附实验结果的影响在砂质潮土上最为明显，其次为红壤土，而在红粘土上的影响几乎可忽略，这可能与土壤本身吸附/致死病毒的能力不同有关；土壤灭菌后进一步加剧气-水界面对砂质潮土吸附实验结果的偏差，而在红壤土上则有减弱趋势.气-水界面存在显著降低空白实验病毒回收率，其降低趋势随气-水界面的增加而加剧，当加入土壤后，土壤颗粒有可能阻止病毒接近气-水界面或改变病毒吸附在固-液-气界面的力量，因而气-水界面存在时的空白实验结果并非为真正的空白实验结果，这可能是导致气-水界面引起静态吸附实验结果偏差的主要原因. |
| 英文摘要 |
| The presence of air-water interface in batch sorption experiments may result in inaccurate estimation of virus adsorption onto various soils. A batch sorption experiment was conducted to compare the adsorption results of MS2 in different soils under presence/absence of air-water interface. Soils with sterilization/nonterilization treatment were used. Virus recovery efficiency in a blank experiment (no soil) was also evaluated as affected by different amount of air-water interface. The presence of air-water interface altered the results of virus adsorption in different soils with different extent, with Sandy fluvo-aquic soil being the most considerably affected, followed by Red loam soil, and the least being Red clay soil, probably because of different soil properties associated with virus adsorption/inactivation. Soil sterilization resulted in more significant difference of virus adsorption onto the Sandy fluvo-aquic soil between the presence and absence of air-water interface, while a reduced difference was observed in the Red loam soil. The presence of air-water interface significantly decreased virus recovery efficiency, with the values being decreased with increase in the amount of air-water interface. Soil particles likely prohibit viruses from reaching the air-water interface or alter the forces at the solid-water-air interface so that the results from the blank experiment did not truly represent results from control blank, which probably resulted in adsorption difference between presence and absence of the air-water interface. |
